Oransky v. Stepanavich

Houck, J.,

— This is a rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered on the pleadings against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendant. In the plaintiffs’ declaration it is alleged that the defendant *593is in possession of certain real estate to which the plaintiffs are entitled, and the plaintiffs seek to recover possession of the premises, together with mesne profits from Feb. 9, 1929. The plaintiffs’ abstract of title sets forth two conveyances: the first, a deed dated Feb. 7, 1924, from Max Plocinak and Mary Plocinak, his wife, to Peter Stepanavich, including the premises here in…