Legal Opinion

Webster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 2004No. CR-01-1656PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Maurice Ray Webster, Mike Stewart, and Bill Greer appeal their convictions under Alabama's Code of Ethics, § 36-25-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. We affirm in part and remand.

Webster, the owner of Webster Construction Company, was convicted of offering things of value for the purpose of influencing official action, a violation of § 36-25-7(a), Ala. Code 1975 (count three of the indictment), and, as an accomplice, of using an official position or office for personal…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ex Parte FairclothSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Bankston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Ex Parte FrithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Ex Parte State, Cr-10-0634 (ala.crim.app. 5-27-2011)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API