Legal Opinion

Cook v. United Railways & Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Hbutsleb, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

The plaintiff, appellant in this Court, brought suit to recover damages from the United Railways and Electric Company of Baltimore for injury to an auto»-ambulance, occasioned by a collision between his machine while being operated by one of his employees and a street car owned by the defendant and operated by its employees. The ambulance in question was of Cadillac make, weighing something over two tons.

On the morning of January 21, 1916, the plaintiff had been notified from the University Hospital that there was some one at Union Station to be brought to that hospital, and at the time of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  2. Maryland Central Railroad v. NeubeurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. McNab v. United Railways, Etc., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Ray v. BrannanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Baltimore Consolidated Railway Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Davis v. CuestaSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Riley v. State Ex Rel. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Henderson v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Girton v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API