Richardson v. Chicago Packing & Provision Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Thomas C. Huxley, Edward C. Robinson, B. McFadden, and R. M. Fitzgerald, for the motion in favor of Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is a motion by fourteen persons for an order to recall the remittitur hereinbefore issued in the above-entitled cause, and to take further proceedings therein.
The moving parties were defendants in the superior court and recovered judgment against the plaintiff therein, Fortin, for the aggregate amount of $1,793.82, to be divided between them as directed by the judgment, $123.70 thereof to be paid to the defendant therein, D. W. Patterson. Fortin appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The appeal was regularly heard and submitted here, and on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Municipal Bond Co. v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Binning v. Miller, Water Division SuperintendentWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. SundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.