Legal Opinion
Barrow v. Barrow
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 30, 1988No. 70433PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
527 So.2d 1373 (1988)
James BARROW, Petitioner,
v.
Donna BARROW, Respondent.
No. 70433.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 30, 1988.
William R. Platt, Tampa, for petitioner.
Steven T. Northcutt of the Law Offices of Levine, Hirsch, Segall & Northcutt, P.A., Tampa, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
This is a petition to review Barrow v. Barrow, 505 So.2d 506 (Fla.2d DCA 1987), in which the district court held that in partition actions the rules regarding notice of ouster from a former marital home must be applied differently for cotenants who are former spouses than for other cotenants. The circumstances…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coggan v. CogganSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Bird v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1875
- Potter v. GarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Adkins v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Stokely v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Goolsby v. WileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Diaz v. Security Union Title Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Pearce v. PearceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Haas v. HaasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Atkinson v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.