Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

We granted the State’s rule eleven application to review a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals reversing the trial judge’s denial of probation to defendant.

The facts are briefly summarized as follows. John Bell, defendant herein, was a dock employee at Kleer-Yu Industries. Kleer-Vu, according to the testimony of Joe LaPorta, its operations manager, was experiencing employee theft. The company, through LaPorta, made an appeal to all plant employees to the effect that if the losses stopped, Kleer-Vu would “take our losses and suffer them” and no one would be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GrearTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stiller v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. HollingsworthTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. MichaelTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CleavorTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. LangstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BouldinTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BaileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API