Legal Opinion

Dilworth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1896No. 709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This appeal is from a conviction for building and maintaining more than three miles, lineal measure, of pasture fence, running in the same direction, without agatewav in the same, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $25. The charging part of the information is set out in the opinion. No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judged.

Omitting the formal parts of the information in this case, it charges that the appellant “did then and there unlawfully build and maintain more than three miles, lineal measure, of pasture fence, running in the same general direction, without a gateway in the same, against the peace and dignity of .the State.” The statement of facts is an agreement to the effect that the allegations in the information are true. Appellant on the trial was convicted, and fined in the sum of $25, and from this conviction he appeals. Appellant contends that the judgment should be reversed, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McIntire v. LuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Dulaney v. Nolan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bounds v. KirvenTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Fort Worth v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scoggin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API