Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 19, 1963No. [No. 174, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This record reveals no ground whatsoever to support appel lant’s claim of insufficiency of evidence to convict him of armed robbery and carrying a deadly weapon. Three witnesses positively identified him as one of two men who rifled the cash register in a restaurant at revolver point. The trial court in this non-jury case was entitled to believe them, rather than an alibi witness who placed appellant elsewhere. Maryland Rule 886; Knuckles v. State, 228 Md. 318.

Prior to his trial appellant requested the court to appoint another attorney in lieu of his court-appointed counsel, but, when asked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Murray v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Knuckles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Caviness v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API