Legal Opinion

Pitz v. Gonzalez

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2025No. 3:25-cv-04454Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER PITZ, Case No. 25-cv-04454-LJC 8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY AND RESPONDENT’S 10 INESSA GONZALEZ, MOTION TO STRIKE 11 Respondent. Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71 12 Petitioner seeks leave to file a reply to Respondent’s Amended Answer, to rebut statements 13 of fact that Petitioner contends should not have been included there in the first place. ECF No. 70. 14 Respondent opposes such a filing and moves to strike Petitioner’s Motion and the attached 15 proposed reply to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United States National Bank v. First National Finance Company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United States National Bank v. United Oil Well Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API