Legal Opinion

Hiott v. Contracting Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1981No. 21545Published

1Opinion of the Court

276 S.C. 632 (1981)

281 S.E.2d 224

Ethel HIOTT, Appellant,

v.

CONTRACTING SERVICES, Dick Bruchi, Charles Pfaff and Elizabeth Agnew Luke, Respondents.

21545

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 11, 1981.

A. Perritt Rollins, Jr., and Howard R. Chapman, Charleston, for appellant.

J. Rutledge Young, Jr., of Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, for respondent Elizabeth Agnew Luke.

August 11, 1981.

GREGORY, Justice:

This appeal is from an order staying an action by the appellant wife, Ethel Hiott, for loss of consortium. We reverse and remand.

Appellant's husband, Marshall H. Hiott, while employed…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Priester v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Hiott v. Contracting ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Dill v. MoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API