State v. Spencer
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Larson, J.:
We determine in this appeal if Tadisha Yong Spencer’s constitutional rights were violated when her invoking of her Fifth Amendment rights in the preparation of the risk needs assessment of the presentencing investigation (PSI) report resulted in her being placed on probation with community corrections rather than probation with court services.
We find no constitutional violation and affirm the trial court.
Spencer was charged with one count of criminal use of a financial card in September 2001. As the result of plea negotiations, tire charge was reduced to attempted criminal use of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. StarbuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- State v. BordersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. WalbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- German v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008