Legal Opinion

Yoakam v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1893No. 19114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

On February10, 1891, the defendant White executed to the plaintiffs his promissory note and mortgage to secure payment of the same. The note was for seven thousand eight hundred dollars, and was payable five years after date, “ with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date until paid, interest payable annually, and if not so paid, to be compounded annually, and bear the same rate of interest as the principal.” The mortgage stated that it was given as security for the payment of the note, a copy of which was set out in heec verba, and then contained the following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brodribb v. TibbetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. MayersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Byrne v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Van Loo v. Van AkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. San Gabriel Valley Bank v. Lake View Town Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API