Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1986No. 84-0626; CA A35487Published

1DissentRossman, J.

I respectfully dissent. The law of merger has been in a state of confusion for some time in Oregon and needs serious revision, or at least some meaningful clarification. Our struggle with this case is further evidence of this dilemma. The problem is that it is impossible to reconcile all of the many inconsistent cases which are regarded as having some precedential value.

Here, I am convinced that defendant should not be given a bonus by not being sentenced for robbery as well as aggravated murder. He was properly subjected to punishment for each crime that he committed, and he should not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. DillmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. KylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API