Legal Opinion

In Re Campbell

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1991No. 19-20672PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is a rule to show cause why debtor’s bankruptcy petition should not be dismissed for flagrant abuse of the Bankruptcy Code. After notice and hearing the court determines that the rule has not been answered and that debtor’s bankruptcy petition must be dismissed for the reasons set forth below.

I

FACTS

On September 28, 1990, debtor filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Debtor listed liabilities totaling $73,-446.75 on Schedules A-2 and A-3 of his petition. Of that amount, $38,197.42 was secured debt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Mary E. Johnson, Debtor. Mary E. Johnson v. Vanguard Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,178 in Re M. Ibrahim Khan, P.S.C., Debtor. M. Ibrahim Khan v. Dolly K. YusufjiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Setzer v. Hot Productions, Inc. (In Re Setzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  4. In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
  5. In Re BinghamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re KhanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re HammondsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  3. In Re MarksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. In Re SheltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  5. In Re Sugarhouse Realty, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API