Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Vahrenkamp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1936No. 1724PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the district court of McLennan county in which appellant, E. C. Kunz, was denied, .a recovery against appellee, Mrs. F. Vahrenkamp, on a joint and several promissory note for the sum of $760, purporting to have been executed by appellee and Ted C. Vahrenkamp. Recovery was sought against appellee alone on the ground'that Ted C. Vahrenkamp was. dead'and his estate insolvent. Trial was had at the April term of the court and judgment rendered on May 21, 1934. An amended motion for new trial was filed by appellant on June 27,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. E.P. N.E.R.R. Co. v. WhatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Houston Life Insurance v. DabbsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Rogers v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Van Slyck v. Lawyers' Co-Op. Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Dilworth v. Ed. Steves & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arenstein v. JencksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API