Ingalls & Stockman v. Morgan
New York Supreme Court
In EauiTY. The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of obtaining a perpetual injunction, to restrain the defendant from selling, upon a judgment and execution in her favor, and against one Austin Cross, certain real estate described in the bill. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Johnson, J.
The bill in this cause was filed to restrain the defendant, by a perpetual injunction, from selling certain lands and premises in Seneca Falls, in the county of Seneca, upon judgment and execution in her favor against one Austin Cross.
The complainant Ingalls, and Abner N. Beardsley, purchased the premises of Cross, who conveyed the same by deed with covenant of warranty of title. The judgment of the defendant was then a lien upon the premises, but the purchasers were ignorant of its existence and took the conveyance supposing them to be free from incumbrance and under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baring & Willing v. MooreNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Demuth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- McCarty v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Carll v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Ingalls v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1854