Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Brandeburg
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 30, 1996No. 1:95-CV-1092PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
This Court previously ruled that defendant Brad Brandeburg is hable to the plaintiffs for violations of the Fair Housing Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1982. In addition, this Court also found that Brad Brandeburg’s parents, defendants Gerald and Cheryl Brandeburg, are hable to the plaintiffs under O.R.C. § 3109.09, one of Ohio’s parental liability statutes. (See Memorandum and Order of March 18, 1996, docket # 17). These findings were made after the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on the liability issues, which the defendants did not oppose. By…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John W. Marr and Lucille Marr v. Douglas RifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Granger v. Auto-Owners Ins. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Granger v. Auto-Owners Ins. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015