Legal Opinion

Montesino v. Arguello

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1983No. CA-0364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Judge.

This is a suit on a promissory note. Dora T. Arguello is the maker, and Sauro Mon-tesino is the payee of the note, which was dated June 15,1979, and is a promise to pay $10,000.00 in 25 equal monthly installments of $400.00 per month, beginning July 1, 1979, without interest. The note recites the usual clause, acknowledging that for value received, Mrs. Arguello promised to pay $10,000.00 to Sauro Montesino.

The Trial Judge rendered judgment in favor of Mr. Montesino in the amount of $8,000.00, because he found Mrs. Arguello had paid $2,000.00 on the note. Mrs. Ar-guello has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lowenburg v. Labor Pool of America, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Laspopoulos v. EarlLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Kenworthy v. Outlook, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dugas v. Modular Quarters, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Graves v. PorterfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Montesino v. ArguelloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Shawn Ibrahim, Inc., Mahmood Akhtar and Muhammad Amin v. Houston- Galveston Area Local Development Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API