Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Beatty v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 2017No. 3043 652103/14Published

1Dissent

Friedman, J.P., and Andrias, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: Contrary to the majority’s determination, considering all relevant circumstances, including the nature and severity of the misconduct and the mitigating factors raised by petitioner, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the charged offenses as to shock one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]). Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Petitioner, a special education…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hegarty v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Rogers v. Sherburne-Earlville Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Cipollaro v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Nuchman v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Matter of Bolt v. New York City Dept. of Educ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API