Legal Opinion
Blumenschein v. Security Connecticut Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-318PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM’
McCUNE, District Judge.
In this diversity action we consider plaintiff’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. For the reasons that follow, the motions will be denied.
Facts
Plaintiff, LaReita Blumenschein, was the beneficiary under a policy insuring the life of her husband, Ronald Blumenschein deceased. The insurance policy was a de dining term policy designed to pay the balance of a mortgage. The monthly premiums decreased each year, as did the face amount of the policy. It was issued on April 8, 1977.
Ronald Blumenschein died March 4,1979. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Burne v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hess v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Lomma v. Ohio Nat'l Life Assurance Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Blumenschein v. Security-Connecticut Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985