Legal Opinion

Vilseis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 17, 2013No. 4D12-2322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

The admission of an eyewitness’s discovery deposition as substantive evidence at trial compels reversal of this case because it violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Originally charged with five felonies, the defendant was acquitted of three and convicted of two lesser included offenses, burglary of a dwelling and third degree grand theft.

The State’s Case

One morning in 2011, the victim awoke to find that a fire had erupted in his home. In a panic, the victim woke up a guest staying with him and the two rushed out to safety. With the house…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Corydon JudkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  2. Caldwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Gil Camacho v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  5. MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API