People v. Arroyo
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phillip R. Rumsey, J.
By order dated October 10, 2008, this court determined that respondent is a sex offender who requires civil management under Mental Hygiene Law article 10, and directed that he be subject to a regimen of strict and intensive supervision (SIST). On March 13, 2009, petitioner filed a petition for confinement, pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.11 (d) (2), alleging that respondent was charged with harassment for striking another person on March 10, 2009 and that such conduct constituted a violation of the SIST conditions. The conduct giving rise to the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Maurice G.New York Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CalhounAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- STATE OF NEW YORK v. CALHOUN, NORMANAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- STATE OF NEW YORK v. LASHWAY, STEVENAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State v. CalhounAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.