Legal Opinion

Lewis's Assigned Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1895No. Appeal, No. 517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 517, Jan. T., 1894, by Rush Donley, from order of C. P. Chester Co., Oct. T., 1892, No. 7, dismissing exceptions to confirmation of sheriff’s sale. Exceptions to confirmation of sheriff’s sale. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Frror assigned was the order dismissing exceptions to confirmation of the sheriff’s sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

On the 9th of January, 1892, Daniel H. Lewis made an assignment for the benefit of creditors to Francis C. Hooton, Esq. The assigned estate consisted exclusively of a life estate of Lewis in a tract of about ninety acres of improved land in East-town township, in Chester county. At the date of the assignment, Landis & Erisman had a judgment duly entered of record *377against Lewis; Francis C. Hooton also had a judgment against the same defendant.

On October 18,1892, Landis & Erisman issued fi. fa. on their judgment, and on this writ the life estate was levied and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dennison's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  2. Pentland v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Snavely v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  4. Gordon v. InghramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Parget v. StambaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API