Legal Opinion

Kalkhoff Co. v. Russian Orthodox St. Nicholas Church

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal By the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

Plaintiff read the direct examination of the Rev. Alexander Hotovitsky from a deposition takeip Before trial, on Behalf of the defendant, By stipulation. As plaintiff was about to read the “ cross-examination,” the court, sustained defendant’s objection thereto on the ground that plaintiff had made this witness his own, and could not, therefore, cross-examine him. Sections 881 and 911 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide that a deposition may Be read in evidence By either party. In Cudlip v. Evening Journal, 180 N. Y. 85, a deposition was taken at defendant’s instance before trial, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cudlip v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Berdell v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donahoe v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. National Fire Insurance of Hartford v. ShearmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Schnabel v. American Educational AllianceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API