Michael Horvath v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are operators of massage parlors in which nude, or partially nude, female employees masturbate male patrons. Defendants have threatened to commence civil proceedings in the Illinois courts to enjoin these business practices as a nuisance prohibited by § 192.1 of the Municipal Code of the City of Chicago.1 Plaintiffs commenced this federal action seeking a declaratory judgment that § 192.1 is unconstitutionally “vague and overbroad,” and an injunction against its enforcement against them. This appeal is from the district court’s denial of a preliminary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lang v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Michael Horvath v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975