Legal Opinion

Michael Neal v. Gary Grammer, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1992No. 91-2389PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge.

Michael Neal appeals from an order of the district court 1 denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus 769 F.Supp. 1523. Neal raises five issues on appeal. First, he alleges that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Second, Neal claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Third, he claims that the guilty plea lacked a factual basis and, fourth, that his guilty plea was involuntary. Finally, he alleges that he failed to receive due process when he was denied a continuance to allow him to retain new counsel.

We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Douglas Eugene MorseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. WicksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reeves v. HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1994
  4. United States v. Brian AtteberryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. DawsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API