Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Tribune Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 (“the Union”) filed this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1982), 1 against defendant Chicago Tribune Company (“the Tribune”) for the alleged breach of a supplemental agreement containing certain job security clauses for composing room employees. The Tribune has submitted a motion to dismiss the case under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, that motion is denied.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.