Legal Opinion

Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Tribune Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 22, 1986No. 86 C 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 (“the Union”) filed this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1982), 1 against defendant Chicago Tribune Company (“the Tribune”) for the alleged breach of a supplemental agreement containing certain job security clauses for composing room employees. The Tribune has submitted a motion to dismiss the case under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, that motion is denied.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API