United States v. Burman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Concurring in the judgmentColloton, Circuit Judge
I join Parts I, II.A, and II.C of the opinion of the court, but for the reasons stated in United States v. Bastian, 603 F.3d 460, 467 (8th Cir.2010) (concurring opinion), I decline to join Part II.B. He who places an open box of treats in a common area of an office may be distributing treats, ante, at 1118, but USSG § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) applies only where the defendant is engaged in a “transaction” that is conducted “for a thing of value.” Id. § 2G2.2, comment. (n.l); see United States v. Spriggs, 666 F.3d 1284, 1287 (11th Cir.2012); United States v. Rogers, 666 F.Supp.2d 148, 153-54 (D.Me.2009),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. IcazaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Unis BahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BastianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.