Basaldua v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceOdom, Judge
I concur in the conclusion of the majority that appellate jurisdiction does not lie in *8this case, and that habeas corpus jurisdiction does lie. I also share the concern expressed by the dissent that some may misconstrue the majority opinion as creating an “expansion of our habeas corpus jurisdiction [that] will open a ‘Pandora’s box’ of frivolous claims.” I do not, however, find the majority’s conclusion “that the imposition of conditions of probation that contain unconstitutional infringements of freedom of action constitutes a ‘restraint’ within the scope of habeas corpus relief” creates…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte CasarezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Mixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.