Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Bark Windermere

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 19, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Choate, D. J.

This is a libel in rem against a foreign vessel, upon a contract made by the master with the libellant, for labor and services in removing the ballast, while in this port, for the purpose of putting her in condition to receive the cargo for her intended voyage. The libel avers that the services were performed on the credit of the vessel. The owner has appeared as claimant, and excepts to the libel on the following grounds: First, that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a maritime lien or cause of aetion herein; second, that the court has no jurisdiction upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. The CircassianDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1867
  3. The OnoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1873
  4. M'Dermott v. The S. G. OwensU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1849

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Veasey v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Williams v. The SiriusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895
  3. Vanhoesen v. The SegurancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  4. Terminal Fumigating Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
  5. Pond v. The Hattie ThomasDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API