Legal Opinion

Liebovich v. Minnesota Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 24, 2007No. 2006AP405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. We are here required to construe a homeowner's insurance policy. What makes this case unusual is that the policy we construe is no ordinary policy. Rather, as the summary judgment record shows, this AIG Private Client Group policy is an "innovative insurance" product designed to "enhance protection and minimize threats to the personal wealth of high net worth individuals." AIG touted the product as one "exclusively for high net worth individuals ... crafted to ensure broad coverage." Indeed, the policy holder here, the plaintiff, Gregory Liebovich, paid a premium of $4751 for this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Doyle v. EngelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liebovich v. Minnesota InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Maxwell v. Hartford Union High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Krueger International, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Easy PC Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Kreuger International, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API