Legal Opinion
Clinton Mills, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 1, 1988No. C/A 6-87-2037-17PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOE F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
The defendant and third-party plaintiff in this action, Alexander & Alexander (A & A) has moved for an Order disqualifying Mr. Edward Kallal and the law firm of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan (Sutherland Asbill) of Atlanta, Georgia, from representing plaintiffs in this litigation. The motion is based on A & A’s contentions that Kallal and other members of Sutherland Asbill were intimately involved in the events which formed the basis of this action and that Kallal’s testimony would be both necessary and detrimental to his client. Oral argument was heard…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Ceramco, Inc. v. Lee PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- International Woodworkers Of America, Afl-Cio, Clc v. Chesapeake Bay Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Hirschkop v. SneadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba SeedsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Brown v. DanielDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
- United States v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Personalized Mass Media Corp. v. Weather Channel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.