Legal Opinion
In re Taylor
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 18, 1949No. 1145PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HULEN, District Judge.
Our memorandum, D.C., 75 F.Supp. 496, on petitioners’ request for limitation of liability under Admiralty Rule 51, 28 U.S. C.A., recites the history of the case prior to reference to Commissioner. The Commissioner has filed his report. There were eleven death claims filed with the Commissioner. Allowances were recommended on eight under the Missouri death “penalty” statute, Sec. 3652, R.S.Mo.1939, Mo.R.S.A., ■two were under the Missouri death compensatory statute, Laws of Mo.1945, page 846, Mo.R.S.A. § 3654, no allowance was recommended on one death claim. Petitioners…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Just v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Follett's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1958