Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Maxfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 21, 1959No. 4725PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The question before us is whether the defendants, owners and occupiers of the premises, may be found liable in the circumstances here to the plaintiff, who was there at their invitation as a social guest, or what is known as a gratuitous licensee. Restatement, Torts, s. 331; Sandwell v. Elliott Hospital, 92 N. H. 41, 44. The law is well established here and, we believe, by the better authorities elsewhere, that in these circumstances the general rule is that the only duty owed the plaintiff by the defendants relative to the condition of the premises was to use reasonable care to warn her of…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Cyrenus Couture, Adm. Estate of Richard Couture v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. R. Hoe & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Rumford Printing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Pillsbury-Flood v. Portsmouth HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Weldy v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. MacIe v. HelmsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API