Legal Opinion

Brown v. Lacy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. It was decided upon the former hearing that the payment of a promissory note governed by the law merchant to an innocent holder, to whom it had been endorsed for value before maturity, was not a voluntary payment, and that usurious interest included in such payment might be recovered of the payee of the note. Lacy v. Brown, 67 Ind. 478.

*437Upon the second hearing of the case in the court below, the appellee, over answers by the appellant which need not be stated, obtained a judgment. The appellant insists that the court erred in giving and refusing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. DumasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. Lacy v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harbaugh v. TannerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API