Watson v. County of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
We hold today that a plaintiff who succeeds in obtaining a preliminary injunction can be deemed a “prevailing party” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1988, even though he did not recover other relief sought in the lawsuit. We also hold that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it declines to assess against a defendant attorney’s fees incurred by a plaintiff in opposing a motion to intervene brought by strangers to the lawsuit.
I. Facts
Tracy Watson, a former Riverside County deputy sheriff, participated in a highly publicized vehicle chase that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazile v. Joseph L. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Love v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Sole v. WynerSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carbonell v. I.N.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Select Milk Producers, Inc. v. JohannsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Richard S. v. Department of Developmental Services of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.