Legal Opinion

Haller v. Digman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1933No. 7510PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hatoher, Judge:

The collection of a judgment of a justice is sought to be prohibited in this proceeding.

The summons in the action is to “M. M. Haller, guardian for Mary Haller and Carl Haller. ’ ’ The return states that the summons was executed “By leaving a copy thereof posted at the front door of the usual place of abode of the said M. M. Haller, guardian for Mary Haller and Carl Haller, neither his wife nor any other member of his family over the age of sixteen years being found there, and he not being found.” The judgment was rendered “in favor of plaintiffs against defendant for the sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Davis v. TrumpWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Merchants' Nat'l Bank v. HudkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. SmootWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Selvey's Executors v. Armstrong's AdministratorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cannon v. Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API