Legal Opinion

Fantini v. School Committee

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 13, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

This is a bill in equity for declaratory and other relief. The plaintiffs are residents and registered voters of the city of Cambridge; the defendants are the school committee and the city council. Frank J. Frisoli, superintendent of the schools of the city, intervened and filed a bill for declaratory relief. The case was tried on a statement of agreed facts, and the judge made findings of fact, declarations of law and an order for decree. From a final decree dismissing the bills with prejudice, the plaintiffs.and the intervener appeal. We summarize the judge’s findings, which he adopted as a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dooling v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Gorman v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Quinlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Casey v. City of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Murphy v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LaBranche v. A.J. Lane & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Moore v. School Committee of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Andrade v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. School Committee v. Finance CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API