Legal Opinion

Barton v. Higgs

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 9, 2009No. 26594PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

In this workers’ compensation case, the court of appeals held that Petitioner South Carolina Uninsured Employers’ Fund (the Fund) was responsible for paying benefits to an injured employee. Barton v. Higgs, 372 S.C. 109, 641 S.E.2d 39 (Ct.App.2007). We granted a writ of certiorari to review that decision and now reverse.

*369Factual/Procedural Background

David Barton (Claimant) was employed by William Higgs d/b/a Iyanel Enterprises (Iyanel), which served as the roofing subcontractor for Respondent Total Home Exteriors (Total Home). On November 22, 2003, Claimant sustained a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Therrell v. Jerry's Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Freeman Mechanical, Inc. v. J.W. Bateson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hopper v. Terry Hunt ConstructionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Barton v. HiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Hopper v. Terry Hunt ConstructionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Hopper v. Terry Hunt ConstructionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Whigham v. Jackson Dawson CommunicationsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API