Legal Opinion
Scalione v. Bosch
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 5, 1926No. 1824PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, awarding priority of invention to the party Bosch, as against the parties Sealione and Heimann. Heimann took no appeal.
The invention is a process of producing a compound nondeliquescent fertilizer, consisting in mixing together ammonium nitrate and an alkali metal chloride in about equivalent proportions in the presence of water.
Given the benefit of his German application, Bosch is entitled to a date for constructive reduction to practice prior to any date claimed by Sealione. Two of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seror v. DickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owen v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Arthur v. Maersk IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Scalione v. BoschCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.