Ferrari v. Nola Renewal Group, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge,
11 This is a petitory action. This case arises out of litigation in which Ronald Ferrari^ the plaintiff and the defendárit-ih-reconvention, sought to be declared the owner of two parcels of land — Lot 21-A ánd' Lot 22-B; , NOLA Renewal Group, LLC (“NOLA”), the defendant and "the plaintiff-in-reconvention, alleges that it' acquired ownership of both lots by acquisitive prescription pursuant to La. R.S. 9:563s.1 From the trial court’s judgment finding NOLA acquired ownership of Lot 21-A, Mr. Ferrari appeals. From the trial court’s judgment finding NOLA did not acquire…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Syrie v. SchilhabSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Pollard v. SchiffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Mouledoux v. SkipperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brittany and Jamar Waiters v. Renee E. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Judy Barrie v. City of New Orleans and Tiffany A. RomanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021