Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

Relying upon the general rule that a juvenile cannot be prosecuted for the crime of bail jumping (see, Matter of Natasha C, 80 NY2d 678; Matter of John D., 186 AD2d 564), defendant argues that his bail jumping conviction should be reversed because he was a juvenile when he was admitted to bail in the underlying criminal action. The argument is rejected. Defendant was 16 years old when he failed to appear as directed while on bail, and County Court clearly had jurisdiction to admit defendant to bail in the underlying action even though defendant was then less than…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Di DonatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. EiffelNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In re Natasha C.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. BoyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. Di DonatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. McKoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re Joe A.New York City Family Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API