Legal Opinion

Broome v. Lantz

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 10522PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

There are two appeals herein, one by the defendant from that portion of the judgment which is in the plaintiff’s favor, and one by the plaintiff from that portion thereof in the defendant’s favor. Our main consideration will be given to the first of the foregoing appeals. The action is one to quiet title to certain portions of the Guadalasca Rancho, situate in the county of Ventura, to which the plaintiff, as the owner of the larger portion of said rancho, also claims title, the complaint being in the usual form employed in such actions. There are two separate parcels of land described in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Moore v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Dominguez De Guyer v. BanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Claudino v. PereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API