Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Arenz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1932No. 6865Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, engaged in "the business, among other things, of furnishing surety bonds to contractors, objected to the discharge in' bankruptcy of George C. Arenz, a contractor, for whom it had executed a surety bond for the sum of $71,306.25 on May 15> 1929, for the performance of a contract with the state of Oregon for the improvement of highways. This objection was based upon the ground that the bankrupt procured the execution of said surety bond by certain written false statements concerning his financial standing made by him to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  4. Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API