Legal Opinion

Heitmanis v. Rayes (In re Rayes)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 16, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 08-40809; Adversary No. 08-04453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WALTER SHAPERO, Bankruptcy Judge.

Introduction

Defendants pled guilty to Embezzlement from a Vulnerable Adult in a state court proceeding and were ordered to pay restitution. Plaintiff filed this adversary proceeding seeking nondischargeability of the restitution amounts under various subsections of 11 U.S.C. § 523 and now seeks summary judgment. For the following reasons, summary judgment is denied.

Background

Joseph Rayes and Sandra Rayes, the debtor-defendants in this case (“Defendants”) both pled guilty in the Macomb County, Michigan…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawaii ex rel. Office of Consumer Protection v. Parsons (In re Parsons)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  2. Mills v. Caisse (In re Caisse)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2017
  3. Benson A. Snaider and Marsha Levitt SnaiderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API