Legal Opinion

Jay Dee Shoes, Inc. v. Ostroff

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 17, 1948No. [No. 190, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.

This suit was instituted in the Baltimore City Court by Louis C. Ostroff against Modern Shoe Company, a corporation, and Jay Dee Shoes, Inc. for breach of a contract. At the conclusion of all the testimony in the case, the court directed the jury to find a verdict for the Modern Shoe Company, which was accordingly done, and judgment entered thereon, from which no appeal was taken. At the same time the court overruled a demurrer prayer and permitted the case to go to the jury, as to Jay Dee Shoes, Inc. A verdict was rendered by the jury in favor of the plaintiff against that defendant, and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williar v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  2. Schwender v. SchrafftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Williar v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API