Legal Opinion
Vasquez v. Barnhart
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided November 8, 2006No. C06-3021-PAZPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZOSS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 16, 2006, the court granted the defendant’s unopposed motion (Doc. No. 8) to reverse and remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On November 6, 2006, the plaintiff filed an application for attorney’s fees (Doc. No. 13).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)(B) requires motions for attorney’s fees to be “filed no later than 14 days after entry of judgment,” unless a different time is specified by statute or court order. The rule is modified by this court’s Local Rule 54.2, which provides as follows:
In all Social…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Albert JACKSON, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Welter v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Pierce v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bantz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2022
- Former Emp. of Marlin Firearms Co. v. United States Sec'y of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Harris v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Joshua D. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2026
- Minor v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.