Cunningham v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells, and Sam’l W. Mc-Elkoy, judges.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
John S. Cunningham, the plaintiff in error, sued one Arthur E. Neeley before a justice of the peace in Wyandotte county, and garnished the railway company, defendant in error, in whose employ Neeley was working. The railway company is a Missouri corporation, but its road runs into and through a part of Wyandotte county. Its principal office is in Nansas City, Mo., where Neeley lived, his wages being payable there. Neeley was the head of a family which resided with him, and under the laws of Missouri the wages due him from the railway company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Watson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Latah County v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilson v. BurneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. HuffakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Madden v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Rothschild Bros. Hat Co. v. LotiefCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Service Printing Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937