William J. Bumgarder v. Keene Corporation, Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Invoking diversity jurisdiction, William Bumgarder, a resident of North Carolina, sued several foreign corporations in the district court. His complaint was dismissed upon a finding that South Carolina’s “door-closing” statute, S.C. Code § 15-5-150, barred the action. Bumgarder appeals, and we affirm.
The district court properly determined that Bumgarder’s case did not fall within the terms of § 15-5-150, for he is neither a resident of South Carolina, nor did his cause of action against Keene or Forty-Eight arise within the state. Although Bumgarder relies upon Szantay v. Beech Aircraft…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
3Cited by14 opinions
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. And Scm Corporation v. C. F. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- Tuttle Dozer Works, Inc. v. Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Rollins v. Proctor & SchwartzDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- Collins v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.