Legal Opinion

William J. Bumgarder v. Keene Corporation, Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1979No. 78-1247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Invoking diversity jurisdiction, William Bumgarder, a resident of North Carolina, sued several foreign corporations in the district court. His complaint was dismissed upon a finding that South Carolina’s “door-closing” statute, S.C. Code § 15-5-150, barred the action. Bumgarder appeals, and we affirm.

The district court properly determined that Bumgarder’s case did not fall within the terms of § 15-5-150, for he is neither a resident of South Carolina, nor did his cause of action against Keene or Forty-Eight arise within the state. Although Bumgarder relies upon Szantay v. Beech Aircraft…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. And Scm Corporation v. C. F. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  3. Tuttle Dozer Works, Inc. v. Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Rollins v. Proctor & SchwartzDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. Collins v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API