Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Hillmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1889Published

Motion for Rehearing. The fact-s are stated in Insurance Go. v. Hillmer, supra, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court for July, 1889.

1Per curiam

This is an application for a rehearing. It is asserted “that the evidence in the ease does not support the opinion heretofore rendered; that there is no evidence to show that Thomas knew a thing about the ten-dollar payment, and surely nothing to indicate that he kept back a thing in the case.” The twenty-sixth finding of the trial court commences as follows:

“That on December 2,1885, the said Thomas, in pursuance of the request of said Hillmer, wrote the said home office a letter, and inclosed therein ten dollars in money, which said letter was duly registered and mailed at Topeka, Kansas,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wehrkamp v. WilletNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1860
  2. May v. StraussNew York City Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API